Recently published on Global Competition Policy.
|
Commentary on the Google/DoubleClick Clearance |
| Competitor Complaints About Google/DoubleClick Rejected Leah Brannon (Cleary Gottlieb) Both the Commission and the FTC conducted extraordinarily thorough reviews, investigating various complaints ranging from the economically unsound to the truly bizarre. Market Definition, Competition, and Privacy in the Google/DoubleClick Transaction Lifting the Fog: Google/DoubleClick Demystified Google/DoubleClick and the Power of Information to Raise Antitrust Concerns in Vertical Mergers |
|
Critical Loss Analysis in Merger Review |
| Critical Loss Analysis in the Whole Foods Case Kevin Murphy & Robert Topel (University of Chicago Graduate School of Business) The critical loss analysis used by Whole Foods’ economist is not useful as a general matter and cannot be used as a tool of market definition. Beyond Critical Loss: Properly Applying the Hypothetical Monopolist Test |
|
Reaction to the Intel Antitrust Allegations |
| AMD v. Intel: An Assault on Price Competition Robert Cooper (Gibson Dunn) Accepting the notion that aggressively discounting prices might expose a company to a possible violation of the antitrust laws would chill the very price competition antitrust laws are meant to promote. State of New York Launches Investigation of Intel: The Global Drumbeat Continues |
|
The Federal Court of Appeal’s Decision in Labatt |
| The Canadian Competition Bureau’s Attempt to Halt Beer Merger Goes Flat Mark Katz (Davies Ward) The FCA’s decision confirms that the threshold for relief under section 100 is more onerous than many in the Canadian competition bar had thought. |
